Dear God No!

Audience Reviews

View More

03/31/2020 It sucked in that good ole grindhouse way. Gritty shitty and full of fucked up scenes and gore. See more 10/31/2016 A mess of a film, which is meant, I think, to be a homage to the exploitation films of the 70s, but comes off looking like a lot of ideas just thrown together with no real meat to them. Also, I would have expected a film of this nature to have some humour in it, but not one iota did I find. See more 07/25/2016 The first act is absolutely horribly edited, some of the worst professional work I've ever seen in that aspect. And it doesn't pick up massively afterwards. I'm glad Gridhouse Revival is a thing, but Dear God No! is not a great example of it. For the most part they embrace the deliberately terrible qualities and play the exploitation almost entirely for laughs (seriously there is a ten minute sequence with a trio of Nixon strippers) but there is a scene in the middle of pretty traumatising sexual violence, which is so drastically juxtaposed to the light-hearted attitude of the style that came before it and after that it's actually really uncomfortable. Not in an "Oh what a great movie, it made me feel something way." More of an "Ew I'm really not sure what inspired this choice stylistically, should I turn this off now?" way. But there's some humour, some bad gore and some Supernatural-Nazi jazz going on in there too, so if that's your sort of thing then I guess you could do worse than Dear God No! ...If you tried really hard. See more 06/18/2015 Grindhouse effort with terrible production values and even worse acting, which really lets down the film, although the story is fairly simplistic too. See more 06/12/2015 Pretty gritty for a comedy horror See more 05/04/2015 (25%) A movie that on the one hand is a fair and honest homage to bad biker movies with their dire story telling, terrible writing, and woeful production values that in a parameter of sleazy trash cinema works as an actual throw-back, but on the other hand you cannot help but think that Quentin Tarrantino has a fair amount to answer for. It's clear this in its own way wants to be a bad film taken from within the boundaries of a low budget sleaze picture from the early to mid 70's, but is that achievement in itself worthy of actual merit? I'm not entirely sure. There are times when this does feel like the genuine article, but again is that worthy of merit? I'm somewhat split on this one. Yes, this is a really bad movie, and yes that was the whole point, but that doesn't mean this is 100% not worth a look for the cult fans out there. For those with zero interest in the old, hugely flawed films need not apply. See more Read all reviews

Dear God No!

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now