The Sound of Music (1965)
83%
EDIT
“Pure, unadulterated kitsch, not a false note, not a whiff of reality; and every detail so carefully worked out... I came out full of goodwill toward all humanity.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 14, 2019
Full Review
Harlot (1965)
EDIT
“Warhol is the Ponzi of the movie world, a comparison he would probably enjoy if he knew who Ponzi was.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 14, 2019
Full Review
Last Year at Marienbad (1961)
93%
EDIT
“It is a charade, a masque, beautiful to the eyes -- I can't remember a film of more sustained visual delight -- and interesting to the mind, or at least to the crossword-puzzle-solving part of the mind, but curiously lacking in emotional affect.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 14, 2019
Full Review
Morgan! (1966)
65%
EDIT
“If Morgan! is supposed to be a comedy, and certain desperate attempts at slapstick suggest maybe it is, then I was not amused.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 14, 2019
Full Review
Dear John (1964)
EDIT
“Lars Magnus Lindgren avoids defects of his fellow-countryman, Bergman, but he also avoids his virtues; he is never pretentious and he is never imaginative.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 14, 2019
Full Review
Help! (1965)
86%
EDIT
“A witless orgy of expensive production that strangles the Beatles, so fresh and spontaneous in [A Hard Day's Night], in a laboriously foolish plot line and smothers them under tons of handsomely colored feathers.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 14, 2019
Full Review
The Pawnbroker (1964)
88%
EDIT
“The Pawnbroker seemed to me a bore and a phony, a vulgarization of a serious theme, an exploitation of cinematic "effects" used without taste or intelligence.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 14, 2019
Full Review
Repulsion (1965)
96%
EDIT
“The purest exercise in homicidal mania yet made, and the most singleminded.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 14, 2019
Full Review
Juliet of the Spirits (1965)
79%
EDIT
“Fellini's eye is as good as ever -- it is the mind, and the feeling, that somehow fails.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 14, 2019
Full Review
This Sporting Life (1963)
96%
EDIT
“Anderson's use of the camera is either too flatly, clutteredly realistic or else too "indicative." Few Hollywood movies are as flimsily motivated as this allegedly realistic film.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
The Fiances (1963)
100%
EDIT
“Technically, Olmi seems to have made all the right choices... His photography is so right that after the first ten minutes of delight, one takes it for granted, forgetting past tortures inflicted on the retina.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
The Leopard (1963)
98%
EDIT
“To transpose a book into a movie means to destroy the form of the original in order to re-create the effect in another medium... Visconti has preserved the form without apparently suspecting it had any meaning.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
Chushingura (1963)
EDIT
“I would compare it rather to the Colosseum, very big. It's a kind of Japanese Gone with the Wind, by which I intend only a small insult.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
La Terra Trema (1948)
82%
EDIT
“This one-way pathos trundles along for three hours slowly, glumly, predictably.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
Sandra (1965)
100%
EDIT
“In general, [Vaghe stelle dell'Orsa] was quite good fun.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
The Loved One (1965)
47%
EDIT
“It is hard to understand how a witty, tightly organized extravaganza like the Waugh novel... could have resulted in such a queasy, humorless, formless botch.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
Six in Paris (1965)
76%
EDIT
“As a nicely colored travelogue, not bad, but people and plots keep interfering, and they are much less interesting than the streets and buildings.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
Mickey One (1965)
71%
EDIT
“Mr. Penn seems to think that by keeping it ambiguous, he can roam more freely on both planes, reality and fantasy. But the confusion -- are we inside or outside of Mickey's head? -- is merely confusing.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
Shakespeare Wallah (1965)
89%
EDIT
“Everyone acts naturally and Mr. Ivory's direction is light and sensitive, managing to suggest the subtlety and comedy and pathos of Anglo-Indian relationships.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
Walkover (1965)
EDIT
“Half the time you don't know what's going on and the other half you don't care.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
Fists in the Pocket (1965)
93%
EDIT
“A mess and a bore, but one that suggested a lot of talent, which the director was too young to discipline his ambitions into art.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
The Shop on Main Street (1965)
100%
EDIT
“The Shop on High Street has modest but solid virtues. It treats seriously -- that is, with a quiet realism that doesn't exclude humor -- a theme I can't recall having been attempted before except in documentaries.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
Gertrud (1965)
71%
EDIT
“[Carl Dreyer] has in his later years developed his less-is-more style beyond effectiveness into mannerism. Gertrud is a further reach, beyond mannerism into cinematic poverty and straightforward tedium.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
Raven's End (1964)
EDIT
“There is a fine performance as the father by Keve Hjelm, but the rest is a slow retelling of a tale I have heard too often.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
Red Beard (1965)
73%
EDIT
“Cinema erupts a couple of times in those first two hours, but for the most part we are treated to lengthy scenes in which the characters talk lengthily to each other while the camera peers up into their faces like a faithful dog.” –
Esquire Magazine
Aug 13, 2019
Full Review
No Reviews Yet
Load More
Something went wrong.. try again